I am more -0 at this point, because I think we need to get our priorities straight before even talking about dates and releases, that's why I wrote that I agree with Sylvain.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 28, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Also I believe Pavel may have switched tacitly to -1 with his "I agree with > Sylvain" email? > >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I change my vote to -1. >> >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Aleksey Yeschenko <alek...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> 1. Release 3.8 as is now. It’s an even preview release that can live >>> fine >>>> with one minor annoyance on upgrade. Have 3.9 released on schedule. >>>> Since the vote technically passed, we can just do it, now. >>>> >>>> 2. Wait until #12236 is in, and release 3.8 then, doesn’t matter when. >>>> Have 3.9+ released on schedule. Even though the delta between 3.8 and >>> 3.9 >>>> would >>>> be tiny, it’s still IMO less confusing than skipping a whole version, >>> and >>>> a lot more preferable than failing the schedule for 4 upcoming 3.x and >>>> 3.0.x releases. >>> >>> I can live with either but as a -1 voter I would prefer #2. >>> >>> -- >>> Jonathan Ellis >>> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra >>> co-founder, http://www.datastax.com >>> @spyced >> >>
