+1 to epaxos

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:

> epaxos would be nice, it's been about 2 years since it was started, and
> Blake asked for a first review well over a year ago.  the benchmarks and
> thorough test suite look like a huge improvement over the current
> situation.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6246
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:28 AM Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose features around seeds:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12627
> >
> > I have other follow up issues like getting seeds from Amazon API, or from
> > JNDI/ DNS, etc.
> >
> > I was hoping 12627 was an easy way to grease the wheels.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jason Brown <jasedbr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Nate,
> > >
> > > I'd like to add CASSANDRA-11559 (Enhance node representation) to the
> > list,
> > > including the comment I made on the ticket (different storage ports for
> > > each node). For us, it's a great "would really like to have" as our
> group
> > > will probably need this in production within the next 1 year or less.
> > > However since it hasn't gotten much attention, I'm not sure if we
> should
> > > add it to the list of "must haves" for 4.0. I'm planning on bringing it
> > up
> > > internally today, as well.
> > >
> > > Also, from the previous 4.0 email thread that Jonathan started back in
> > July
> > > (
> > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cassandra-dev/
> > > 201607.mbox/%3CCALdd-zhW3qJ%3DOWida9nMXPj0JOsru7guOYh6-
> > > 7uTjqEBvacrgQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > )
> > >
> > > - CASSANDRA-11115 (thrift removal) - ticket not mentioned explicitly in
> > the
> > > email, but the notion of removing thrift was
> > > - CASSANDRA-10857 (Allow dropping COMPACT STORAGE flag)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > -Jason
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:43 PM, sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > List looks really good. I will let you know if there is something
> else
> > we
> > > > plan to add to this list.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It was brought up recently at the PMC level that our goals as a
> > > > > project are not terribly clear.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a pretty good point as outside of Jira 'Fix Version'
> > labelling
> > > > > (which we actually suck less at compared to a lot of other ASF
> > > > > projects) this really isnt tracked anywhere outside of general
> tribal
> > > > > knowledge about who is working on what.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to see us change this for two reasons:
> > > > > - it's important we are clear with our community about where we are
> > > going
> > > > > - we need to start working more closely together
> > > > >
> > > > > To that end, i've put together a list (in no particular order) of
> the
> > > > > *major* features in which I know folks are interested, have patches
> > > > > coming, are awaiting design review, etc.:
> > > > >
> > > > > - CASSANDRA-9425 Immutable node-local schema
> > > > > - CASSANDRA-10699 Strongly consistent schema alterations
> > > > > - CASSANDRA-12229 NIO streaming
> > > > > - CASSANDRA-8457 NIO messaging
> > > > > - CASSANDRA-12345 Gossip 2.0
> > > > > - CASSANDRA-9754 Birch trees
> > > > >
> > > > > What did I miss? What else would folks like to see? Specifically,
> > this
> > > > > should be "new stuff that could/will break things" given we are
> > upping
> > > > > the major version.
> > > > >
> > > > > To be clear, it's not my intention to set this in stone and then
> beat
> > > > > people about the head with it. More to have it there to point it
> at a
> > > > > high level and foster better communication with our users from the
> > > > > perspective of an open source project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please keep in mind that given everything else going on, I think
> it's
> > > > > a fantastic idea to keep this list small and spend some time
> focusing
> > > > > on stability particularly as we transition to a new release
> process.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Nate
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to