This is not true. You cannot provide a ConsistencyLevel for the Materialized Views on a table when you do a write. That is, you do not explicitly write to a Materialized View, but implicitly write to it via the base table. There is not consistency guarantee other than eventual between the base table and the Materialized View. That is, the coordinator only acknowledges the write when the proper number of replicas in the base table have acknowledged successful writing. There is no waiting or acknowledgement for any Materialized Views on that table.
Therefore, while you can specify a Consistency Level on read since you are reading directly from the Materialized View as a table, you cannot specify a Consistency Level on wrote for the Materialized View. So, you cannot apply the R+W>RF formula. ---->Brian > On Feb 10, 2017, at 3:17 AM, Kant Kodali <k...@peernova.com> wrote: > > thanks! > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com> > wrote: > >> Yes it is >> >> Am 10.02.2017 00:46 schrieb "Kant Kodali" <k...@peernova.com>: >> >>> If reading from materialized view with a consistency level of quorum am I >>> guaranteed to have the most recent view? other words is w + r > n >> contract >>> maintained for MV's as well for both reads and writes? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>
