+1 interested in seeing and understanding another repair solution. > On Aug 28, 2018, at 1:03 PM, Joseph Lynch <joe.e.ly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm pretty interested in seeing and understanding your solution! When we > started on CASSANDRA-14346 reading your design documents and plan you > sketched out in CASSANDRA-10070 were really helpful in improving our > design. I'm particularly interested in how the Scheduler/Job/Task APIs > turned out (we're working on something similar internally and would love to > compare notes and figure out the best way to implement that kind of > abstraction)? > > -Joey > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:34 AM Marcus Olsson <marcus.ols...@ericsson.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> With the risk of stirring the repair/side-car topic even further I'd just >> like to mention that we have recently gotten approval to contribute our >> repair management side-car solution. >> It's based on the proposal in >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10070 as a standalone >> application sitting next to each instance. >> With the recent discussions in mind I'd just like to hear the thoughts >> from the community on this before we put in the effort of bringing our >> solution into open source. >> >> Would there be an interest of having yet another repair solution in the >> discussion? >> >> Best Regards >> Marcus Olsson >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
