My PoV re: perf: if it's a regression or something that makes a new
feature just Not Work, mark it as bug.

All else mark improvement and can go in in patch rel.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:17 PM Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I see what you mean, I guess my personal line is: does this work worse than
> the previous released version?
> Seems like that's a yes in this case :)
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:35 PM David Capwell <dcapw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > One ticket I wanted to bring up is CASSANDRA-15566, this ticket is not a
> > regression but it is a critical bug.  Personally I feel that only
> > regression should go into a freeze so I have a hard time justifying that
> > ticket right now (all known failure modes have been failing since at least
> > 2.1).  I guess the thing that is hard is where do we draw the line?  One
> > person's bug is another person's improvement, so it's easy for different
> > perspectives to clash on this.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020, 3:27 PM Joseph Lynch <joe.e.ly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:27 PM Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Can we agree to move the improvements out to 4.0.x?
> > >
> > > Generally I've been asked to put performance issues as improvements,
> > > e.g. CASSANDRA-15379. To be frank though we can't run ZstdCompressor
> > > on real clusters without that patch, and therefore I wouldn't feel
> > > great releasing ZstdCompressor in 4.0 without that patch.
> > >
> > > I'm fine to start calling all performance issues "bugs" since at least
> > > in our deployments and I think in many others performance regressions
> > > are P0 bugs that cost a lot of $$, or we can just keep calling them
> > > improvements and just tag them with the ~right target fix version.
> > > Namely 4.0-alpha if the change impacts any public interface in a non
> > > backwards compatible way (yaml, properties, cql, jmx etc...), 4.0-beta
> > > or later if it does not require changes to public interfaces.
> > >
> > > -Joey
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://twitter.com/tjake

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to