+1 for shipping it after 4.0
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:39 AM Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote: > Most of the work to provide this feature is already done. We need to > generate server side CQL for snapshots already. All we need to do is > expose it via either a "DESCRIBE" CQL command, or I'm equally happy to see > it land in a virtual table. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 2:45 PM sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 on holding off and focus on shipping 4.0 > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:25 PM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > This looks like a feature that'd potentially invalidate some testing > > that's > > > been done and we've been feature frozen for over a year and a half. > Also: > > > scope creep. > > > > > > My PoV is we hold off. If we get into a cadence of more frequent > releases > > > we'll have it soon enough. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:03 PM <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Normally I ping the person on the ticket or in Slack to ask him/her > for > > > > status update and whether I can help. Then probably he/she gives me a > > > > direction. > > > > If I can’t find the person anymore, I just use my best judgement and > > > > coordinate with people who might know better than me. > > > > For now this strategy worked for me personally. > > > > Hope this helps > > > > Ekaterina > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > > On 1 Apr 2020, at 14:27, Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hey folks, > > > > > > > > > > I was looking through our open JIRAs and realized we hadn't merged > in > > > > > server side describe calls yet. The ticket died off a ways ago, > and > > I > > > > > pinged Chris about it yesterday. He's got a lot of his plate and > > won't > > > > be > > > > > able to work on it anytime soon. I still think we should include > > this > > > in > > > > > 4.0. > > > > > > > > > > From a technical standpoint, It doesn't say much on the ticket > after > > > > Robert > > > > > tossed an alternative patch out there. I don't mind reviewing and > > > > merging > > > > > either of them, it sounded like both are pretty close to done and I > > > think > > > > > from the perspective of updating drivers for 4.0 this will save > > quite a > > > > bit > > > > > of time since driver maintainers won't have to add new CQL > generation > > > for > > > > > the various new options that have recently appeared. > > > > > > > > > > Questions: > > > > > > > > > > * Does anyone have an objection to getting this into 4.0? The > patches > > > > > aren't too huge, I think they're low risk, and also fairly high > > reward. > > > > > * I don't have an opinion (yet) on Robert's patch vs Chris's, with > > > regard > > > > > to which is preferable. > > > > > * Since soon after Robert put up his PR he hasn't been around, at > > least > > > > as > > > > > far as I've seen. How have we dealt with abandoned patches before? > > If > > > > > we're going to add this in the patch will need some cleanup. Is it > > > > > reasonable to continue someone else's work when they've > disappeared? > > > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
