> > it would probably help to send the link with the tickets being moved away > from GA so people can take a look more easily? >
Good point Paulo. The tickets I moved to 4.0.X are the following. CASSANDRA-16547 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16547> Prioritisation for sized-tier and TW compactions is based on outdated estimation CASSANDRA-16199 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16199> cassandra.logdir undefined when CASSANDRA_LOG_DIR CASSANDRA-16619 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16619> Loss of commit log data possible after sstable ingest CASSANDRA-16592 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16592> The token function in where clause return incorrect data when using token equal condition and Specified a non-exist token value Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 19:56, Paulo Motta <pauloricard...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1, but it would probably help to send the link with the tickets being > moved away from GA so people can take a look more easily? > > Em ter., 20 de abr. de 2021 às 13:24, Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> > escreveu: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I had a look at the 4.0 GA tickets remaining and it looks like several > > tickets are not 4.0 specific. They are simply bugs that have been > > discovered recently (they exist in older releases). > > Unless the problem has been introduced in 4.0 or is a critical issue, it > > should probably not be included in 4.0 GA scope. > > > > I will move those tickets out of the 4.0 GA release and mark them for > > 4.0.XFeel > > free to raise your voice if you believe that an issue should be part of > the > > 4.0 GA scope for some specific reasons. > > >
