Might also want to check among the tickets opened by non-committers and
still awaiting an assignee. E.g.

*assignee is EMPTY AND reporter not in membersOf(Committers)*

There are patches/pull-requests there too.

Best,
Angelo

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:51 PM Benjamin Lerer <ble...@apache.org> wrote:

> >
> > Berenguer created this board to help to track newcomers contributions:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=463&quickFilter=2088
>
>
> My apologies, the board was not accessible to most persons. I solved that
> and everybody should have access to it now.
>
> Some committers are appearing in the list because they do not belong to the
> correct JIRA groups. I opened a ticket to INFRA to solve that problem (
> INFRA-21808 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21808>).
>
> Nevertheless we have obviously a serious issue because even after removing
> the committers we have more than 80 non committer patches waiting for
> reviews. I will try to go through them in the coming weeks to see what
> happened with those patches and what we can do about them.
>
> My hope is that with this new board we can ensure that we provide a timely
> response to newcomers tickets.
>
> Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 13:42, Benjamin Lerer <b.le...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Thanks for the feedback Aleksei,
> >
> > A good way of doing that
> >> is having some rewards. It might be smth material like a T-Shirt (I
> >> remember getting a T-Shirt on C* v2 release was nice; obviously not for
> >> a single commit, but for multiple - depends on the budget; or top 10 the
> >> most active external contributors) or smth free like a virtual badge,
> >> being posted in an annual list of contributors or similar.
> >
> >
> > It seems that we will need to find some sponsors for some t-shirt ;-) We
> > definitely need to have some T-shirts for 4.0!!!
> >
> >   If there is a need I can volunteer/kick off any of the above points.
> >>
> >
> > Please do. Feel free to fire some discussions on the dev list to discuss
> > each of those points. Simply take care to do it for one subject at a time
> > as people might have some trouble to follow all the discussions going on
> > otherwise.
> >
> > Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 13:23, Benedict Elliott Smith <
> bened...@apache.org>
> > a écrit :
> >
> >> Thanks Aleksei,
> >>
> >> Some of these are great points, but to respond specifically to the
> >> checkstyle suggestion: I hope to kick off some (minor) discussion around
> >> codestyle soon to modernise our guide, however I would personally prefer
> >> that code style enforcement remains relatively light touch. Some obvious
> >> things could be enforced by checkstyle (such as the braces), and we
> should
> >> investigate that*, but I would hate for the project to get _too_
> mechanical
> >> about the way code is structured.
> >>
> >> I've been fairly opposed to the upheaval caused by changing build
> >> tooling, but you're right that the barrier to booting up your IDE is a
> big
> >> part of the contribution overhead for newbies, so perhaps we should take
> >> another look at it.
> >>
> >> * I hope to utilise checkstyle soon to prohibit certain specific code
> >> patterns too, but that’s for a much later discussion
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29/04/2021, 12:05, "Aleksei Zotov" <azotc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Hi Benjamin,
> >>
> >>     I'd like to put in my two cents as well.
> >>
> >>     There were many great suggestions related to the communication and
> >>     process. They make sense to me, however, I'd like to look at the
> >> problem
> >>     from another perspective.
> >>
> >>     First of all, let me share my perception on the opensource
> >> activities.
> >>     There are two main reasons why people may want to contribute: 1)
> they
> >>     experience a problem on the current project 2) any kind of
> >> volunteering.
> >>     The first reason is clear, those contributors are not going to stick
> >>     around because they just need to solve their particular problem.
> >>
> >>     The second group of people is our target. In fact, there could be
> >>     numerous reasons why people want to contribute (feel bored, get new
> >>     experience, improve resume, etc), but despite the particular
> >> motivation
> >>     point, people should feel positive of what they are doing. For that
> >> we
> >>     should make sure they feel a part of the team/process and their work
> >>     appreciated.
> >>
> >>     The first point is related to many suggestions that have been
> already
> >>     brought. I feel the most important here is timely replies (even
> >> "sorry,
> >>     we're busy these days, I'll review/respond in two weeks / after xxx
> >>     version is released" is much better than silence). Such "follow up"
> >>     responses do not address the original queries, but they help the
> >>     external contributors to keep courage and remove uncertainty related
> >> to
> >>     the lack of transparency (it might not be clear: a) whether the
> >> request
> >>     is still on someone's radar b) when to expect a response c) when it
> >> is a
> >>     good time to follow up). And obviously a "real" (or at least another
> >>     "follow up") response needs to be provided within the ETA. This
> still
> >>     does not resolve the problem of committers bandwidth, but allows to
> >>     handle spikes in requests from the contributors.
> >>
> >>     Appreciation is the second point. Generally people like making
> >>     achievements, we just need to make every contribution a kind of
> >>     achievement that a person somehow may boast of. A good way of doing
> >> that
> >>     is having some rewards. It might be smth material like a T-Shirt (I
> >>     remember getting a T-Shirt on C* v2 release was nice; obviously not
> >> for
> >>     a single commit, but for multiple - depends on the budget; or top 10
> >> the
> >>     most active external contributors) or smth free like a virtual
> badge,
> >>     being posted in an annual list of contributors or similar. Even
> >> though
> >>     it may sound a bit naive, I believe people like making and counting
> >>     achievements and it might help to attract/retain the contributors.
> >>
> >>     On a separate note, there is a technical part of the problem of
> >>     attracting (not retaining) the contributors. It is really important
> >> to
> >>     make sure that the entry level is low enough and people do not spend
> >>     much time on additional configuration, learning styling guidelines,
> >> etc
> >>     for making their first contribution. No-one likes boring stuff :)
> >>
> >>     Based on my experience among many opensource projects, it is really
> >>     frustrating to spend hours of personal time on getting the build
> >> working
> >>     locally, configuring IDE or similar problems that should not ever
> >> exist
> >>     (or at least be well documented). I believe that many people loose
> >> their
> >>     courage and give up on this stage (it is a kind of uncomfortable to
> >> ask
> >>     for help in running tests in a group chat with 600+ people). For
> >>     example, Intellij configuration (/ant generate-idea-files/) did not
> >> work
> >>     for me (test classpath was missing
> >>     <
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/commit/c65500e8a1213f194531bbfc77f37f0d7bf270df#diff-bca7bec45f530cfea5a78d707c0e0b3790a547da60a551f1e35b551a8c8d56e9R69
> >,
> >>
> >>     imports and formatter configs were not picked up properly) - I fixed
> >> it
> >>     myself. Netbeans configuration
> >>     <
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/commit/5578627d74d0c06fcc0f8e1f7a63f7105ccb5d94
> >
> >>
> >>     was also broken. All such minor issues are really major if they can
> >>     potentially scare away the new contributors.
> >>
> >>     Even though it might sound too technical, I feel we may greatly
> >> benefit
> >>     (in term of attracting the new contributors) from the below changes:
> >>
> >>       - use a generic code style config (https://editorconfig.org/
> >>     <https://editorconfig.org/>), it is supported by Intellij, Eclipse
> >> and
> >>     NetBeans.
> >>
> >>       - migrate to /maven/, all modern IDEs support it pretty well
> >> (/gradle/
> >>     might be an option, but I believe it has slightly worse out of the
> >> box
> >>     integration with IDEs - arguable point). In a combination with the
> >>     previous point, there won't be a need to maintain separate
> >> IDE-specific
> >>     configs. As a result, there are more chances that the IDE
> >> configuration
> >>     will be kept valid and up-to-date. I understand it is a major
> effort,
> >>     but /ant/ is almost died and this change is anyway inevitable.
> >>
> >>       - introduce checkstyle (
> >> https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/anttask.html
> >>     <https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/anttask.html>,
> >>     https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin/
> >>     <https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin/>) that
> >> would
> >>     fail the local build if smth is not-well formatted. Almost every
> >> project
> >>     has its own style preferences (especially C* with its "new line
> >>     braces"). Basically discussing style-related stuff on review
> >> defocuses
> >>     (both contributors and reviewers) from the logic and just wastes
> >> time.
> >>     So it would be great to automate this part (if style if fine build
> >>     passes, otherwise fails).
> >>
> >>     If there is a need I can volunteer/kick off any of the above points.
> >>
> >>
> >>     I hope this helps!
> >>
> >>
> >>     Thanks,
> >>     Aleksei.
> >>
> >>
> >>     On 2021/04/23 14:49:47, Benjamin Lerer <b...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>      > Hi Everybody,The Apache Cassandra project always had some issues
> >> to>
> >>      > attract and retain new contributors. I think it would be great to
> >>     change>
> >>      > this.According to the "How to Attract New Contributors" blog post
> >> (>
> >>      > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/how-attract-new-contributors)
> >> having a
> >>     good>
> >>      > onboarding process is a critical part. How to contribute should
> be
> >>     obvious>
> >>      > and contributing should be as easy as possible for all the
> >> different
> >>     types>
> >>      > of contributions: code, documentation, web-site or help with our
> >> CI>
> >>      > infrastructure.I would love to hear about your ideas on how we
> can
> >>     improve>
> >>      > things.If you are new in the community, do not hesitate to share
> >> your>
> >>      > experience and your suggestions on what we can do to make it
> >> easier
> >>     for you>
> >>      > to contribute.>
> >>      >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to