Resending to the right thread: Hi everyone,
Reading the thread I feel we are all more or less on the same page. My personal line of thinking: 1) I really like Benedict’s idea of some kind of cheat sheet 2) I think some kind of PoC PR/high-level prototype when/if needed, sounds reasonable. Probably It can help in some cases the author to reconsider or even explain better some suggestions/decisions. In that sense, I think I agree with Maulin that probably Jira ticket after voted CEP is a good idea. I think that when we put PR in a Jira ticket (at least I as a creature of habit) we start thinking of more diligent reviews and might forget it is still unapproved CEP and get into details that doesn’t really matter at this point in time. But that might be only me. :-) Best regards, Ekaterina On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 13:32, Maulin Vasavada <maulin.vasav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Based on my experience I definitely like the process where everything that > needs to be discussed about CEP remains in DISCUSS thread. > > Also I like the comment made above " The jira ticket and PR can be created > as a PoC to help explain and illustrate the CEP, but nothing more than > that.". Sometimes it is necessary to really try making code changes and > realize the potential design challenge OR pitfalls and PoC PRs really help > in getting better CEP outcomes. > > I am not sure about JIRA ticket creation while CEP is in DISCUSS. In my > particular example of CEP-9 I just carried over a process from another > Apache project. I think JIRA can be raised once CEP gets Approved and > changes can be officially tracked as JIRA ticket. > > Thanks > Maulin > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:21 AM Scott Hirleman <scott.hirle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Or maybe someone _can_ comment on the JIRA but should also for sure put > > that same comment in the discussion thread? That way, it is at worst > > redundant and doesn't get lost as a comment on a JIRA many may not see? > > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:32 AM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > I think that’s a bit extreme – … > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, that was kinda my intention. But my thinking was just about > getting > > > us out of our habits of using JIRA. Of course I didn't mean any > censure. > > > Once we have some precedence in place, common-sense should prevail. > > > > > > > > > Perhaps we should put together a cheat sheet for kinds of discussion > and > > > > what venue to raise them in at different phases in a CEP lifecycle. > > > > > > > > > > > > Agree. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Scott Hirleman > > scott.hirle...@gmail.com > > >
