> On Aug 22, 2021, at 7:25 PM, Miles Garnsey <miles.garn...@datastax.com> wrote: > > >> >> The problem is that today there’s no way to reliably exclude the new DC from >> serving reads, that I know of? If you can, then yes you would only need to >> ensure repair were run prior to activating reads from this DC. > > We think we have a way to do this using certain settings in the Java driver. > > Agree on your other points! I don’t see how Your best chance is with snitch games And those don’t guarantee correctness if a single replica GC pauses and forces a speculative retry --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements Patrick McFadin
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements bened...@apache.org
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improveme... Mick Semb Wever
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improveme... Mick Semb Wever
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements Miles Garnsey
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements bened...@apache.org
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements Miles Garnsey
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements bened...@apache.org
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improveme... Joshua McKenzie
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improveme... Miles Garnsey
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Impr... Jeff Jirsa
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Impr... Miles Garnsey
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Impr... bened...@apache.org
- Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Impr... Benjamin Lerer