1. +1(nb) 2. +1(nb) 3. +1(nb) On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 7:55, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 23:07, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? > >> 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for > >> Cassandra? > >> 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions in > >> Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? > >> > > > > > > 1. -1 > > > > There's discussions still ongoing around this CEP. I support the CEP but > > believe it is important that the community takes the patience to let > > everyone say their piece and feel that they have been heard. I do not see > > that waiting a week, or two, before another vote risks the inclusion of > > this CEP in this release cycle. I've certainly appreciated reading > through > > every question raised, and wouldn't object to the CEP page being updated > to > > include even more (but this is not a blocker for me). > > > > > With the changes to the CEP resulting from the "Moving CEP-15 forward" > thread, I am changing my vote. > > 1. +1 > 2. +1 > 3. +1 >
