> On Oct 25, 2021, at 1:22 PM, Jeremiah D Jordan <jerem...@datastax.com> wrote: > > The currently proposed changes in CEP-18 should all include improved test > coverage of the modules in question. We have been developing them all with a > requirement that all changes have at least %80 code coverage from sonar cloud > jacoco reports. We have also found and fixed some bugs in the existing code > during this development work.
This is great! We, as a project, should encourage improved test code coverage. So I welcome this change. > So do people feel we should re-propose these as multiple CEP’s or just > tickets? Or do people prefer to have a discussion/vote on the idea of > improving the modularity of the code base in general? My personal preference would be to see this work appear as individual CEPs or even JIRA tickets with discussions but definitely not one giant CEP that is pulling together a lot of different changes. I really like the idea of building pluggable modular components. However, I am concerned about few things. 1. Performance regression. 2. Breaking backward compatibility for our users & tools. 3. Interfaces with single implementation. I would like to ensure that we are mindful of these concerns while making big refactors. Thanks, Dinesh
