We already have a ticket and this predated CEPs, and being an
obviously good improvement to have that many have been asking for for
some time now, I don't see the need for a CEP here.

On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 5:01 AM Stefan Miklosovic
<stefan.mikloso...@instaclustr.com> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> an engineer from Intel - Shylaja Kokoori (who is watching this list
> closely) has retrofitted the original code from CASSANDRA-9633 work in
> times of 3.4 to the current trunk with my help here and there, mostly
> cosmetic.
>
> I would like to know if there is a general consensus about me going to
> create a CEP for this feature or what is your perception on this. I
> know we have it a little bit backwards here as we should first discuss
> and then code but I am super glad that we have some POC we can
> elaborate further on and CEP would just cement  and summarise the
> approach / other implementation aspects of this feature.
>
> I think that having 9633 merged will fill quite a big operational gap
> when it comes to security. There are a lot of enterprises who desire
> this feature so much. I can not remember when I last saw a ticket with
> 50 watchers which was inactive for such a long time.
>
> Regards
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to