Hi folks, Given the feedback received, we thought it would be best to do a CEP. Here's the link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-34
It incorporates the feedback we've received. Please let me know if there are any other comments. We'll wait for a bit and start a VOTE thread for it. Thanks, Dinesh > On Jul 12, 2023, at 12:13 AM, Dinesh Joshi <djo...@apache.org> wrote: > > I can certainly start a VOTE thread for the CQL syntax addition. There > hasn't been any feedback that suggests that there is an unaddressed > concern to the changes we are making. > > That said, I'm not sure if there was explicit decision that has resulted > in an update to the project's governance to reflect this requirement? If > there is I seem to have missed it. There was a discussion in the past > about notifying the dev list to ensure there is visibility to changes > but I don't recall whether there was an explicit voting requirement. > > On 7/11/23 19:17, Yuki Morishita wrote: >>> folks - I think we’ve achieved lazy consensus here. Please continue >> with feedback on the jira. >> >> Hi Dinesh, >> >> As Jeremiah commented on JIRA, shouldn't we have a vote in the ML? >> >> For the future reference, in my opinion, adding new CQL syntax should >> have a CEP as it is not something we can easily change once defined. >
