Is this intended to be used now and change the merge order? I ask because 18705 mentions bumping build.xml and CHANGES.txt amongst others that haven't been done which is leading to confusion.
Kind Regards, Brandon On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 4:46 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > With no objections, and everything folk mentioned above in, the cassandra-5.0 > branch is cut. > > Next steps are bumping trunk to 5.1 and then cutting a 5.0-alpha1 > > The bumping to 5.1 has a few steps involved in it, but the initial in-tree > PRs are ready for review, with CI being run, see CASSANDRA-18705 > > > > On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 00:00, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 to everything stated here. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Brandon >> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:28 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > The previous thread¹ on when to freeze 5.0 landed on freezing the first >> > week of August, with a waiver in place for TCM and Accord to land later >> > (but before October). >> > >> > With JDK8 now dropped and SAI and UCS merged, the only expected 5.0 work >> > that hasn't landed is Vector search (CEP-30). >> > >> > Are there any objections to a waiver on Vector search? All the >> > groundwork: SAI and the vector type; has been merged, with all remaining >> > work expected to land in August. >> > >> > I'm keen to freeze and see us shift gears – there's already SO MUCH in 5.0 >> > and a long list of flakies. It takes time and patience to triage and >> > identify the bugs that hit us before GA. The freeze is about being >> > "mostly feature complete", so we have room for things before our first >> > beta (precedence is to ask). If we hope for a GA by December, account >> > for the 6 weeks turnaround time for cutting and voting on one alpha, one >> > beta, and one rc release, and the quiet period that August is, we really >> > only have September and October left. >> > >> > I already feel this is asking a bit of a miracle from us given how 4.1 >> > went (and I'm hoping I will be proven wrong). >> > >> > In addition, are there any objections to cutting an 5.0-alpha1 release as >> > soon as we freeze? >> > >> > This is on the understanding vector, tcm and accord will become available >> > in later alphas. Originally the discussion¹ was waiting for Accord for >> > alpha1, but a number of folk off-list have requested earlier alphas to >> > help with testing. >> > >> > >> > ¹) https://lists.apache.org/thread/9c5cnn57c7oqw8wzo3zs0dkrm4f17lm3
