Yes please!
> On May 15, 2024, at 2:23 PM, Bret McGuire <bret.mcgu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Very much agreed Paulo; I was musing on the idea of adding Docker support
> to ccm recently as well. We'd want to preserve the current ability to work
> with releases (and Github branches) but I very much like the idea of adding
> Docker support as a new feature.
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:56 PM Paulo Motta <pa...@apache.org
> <mailto:pa...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> As much as I'd like to remove the dependency on ccm I think we'll stick with
>> it for a bit, so +1 on moving under the project umbrella.
>>
>> In the long term it would be nice to modernize integration test suites to
>> use containers instead of processes for more flexibility and fewer
>> dependencies for local development. Perhaps an incremental way to do that
>> would be to add a docker backend to ccm.
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:25 PM Bret McGuire <bret.mcgu...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:bret.mcgu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Speaking only for myself I _love_ this idea. The various drivers use
>>> ccm extensively in their integration test suites so having this tool
>>> in-house and actively looked after would be very beneficial for our work.
>>>
>>> - Bret -
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:23 AM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:jmcken...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> Right now ccm isn't formally a subproject of Cassandra or under governance
>>>> of the ASF. Given it's an integral components of our CI as well as for
>>>> local testing for many devs, and we now have more experience w/our muscle
>>>> on IP clearance and ingesting / absorbing subprojects where we can't track
>>>> down every single contributor to get an ICLA, seems like it might be worth
>>>> revisiting the topic of donation of ccm to Apache.
>>>>
>>>> For what it's worth, Sylvain originally and then DataStax after transfer
>>>> have both been incredible and receptive stewards of the projects and
>>>> repos, so this isn't about any response to any behavior on their part.
>>>> Structurally, however, it'd be better for the health of the project(s)
>>>> long-term to have ccm promoted in. As far as I know there was strong
>>>> receptivity to that donation in the past but the IP clearance was the
>>>> primary hurdle.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have any thoughts for or against?
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/riptano/ccm
>>>>
