reply below On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 21:56, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'd like to propose we treat all data loss bugs as "fix by default on all > supported branches even if that might introduce user-facing changes". > > Even if only N of M people on a thread have experienced it. > Even if we only uncover it through testing (looking at you Harry). > And… Even when the fix is only partial, so really it's more about more forcefully alerting the operator to the problem via over-eager unavailability …? Sometimes a principled stance can take us away from the important details in the discussions. (note, i do accept doing this in 5.0, on the right understanding. e.g. the importance of client retry when doing range movements)
