> if we are counting on users to read NEWS.txt, can we not count on them to > enable rejection if this is important to them?
I think we can make the inverse statement… if accepting data loss is a tradeoff they want then disabling is there for them? So we could default for safety and let you opt-out if you prefer? > On Sep 12, 2024, at 11:19 AM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 1:13 PM Caleb Rackliffe > <calebrackli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think I can count at least 4 people on this thread who literally have lost >> sleep over this. > > Probably good examples of not being the majority though, heh. > > If we are counting on users to read NEWS.txt, can we not count on them > to enable rejection if this is important to them? > > Kind Regards, > Brandon
