On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 09:40, Štefan Miklošovič <smikloso...@apache.org> wrote:
> That is cool but this still does not show / explain how it would look like > when it comes to dependencies needed for actually talking to storages like > s3. > As Benedict writes, dealing with optional dependencies is not hard (and as Jon writes we should work on improving how we deal with it). More configurable paths would also be welcome (snapshots, backups, etc), and you can already see that in the StorageProvider.DirectoryType enum. Given the overlap this has with other work ongoing the CEP should be written to account and coordinate for that. Simply configuring different paths will certainly satisfy a lot of user's demands. Object storage is still a very valuable goal (as Jeff and Scott writes). Maxwell, are you interested in updating the CEP to reflect all the new input ? I believe that's the next step here, and I'd be happy to help if you took the lead.
