We're at 10 binding +1. Need 3 more to move this across the line.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025, at 6:58 PM, Joseph Lynch wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 1:47 PM David Capwell <dcapw...@apple.com> wrote: >> +1 >> >>> On Jun 17, 2025, at 3:44 AM, Štefan Miklošovič <smikloso...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 1:58 PM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> __ >>>> [DISCUSS] thread: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vr7j2ob92k6fbcwvlfo60l3scylzdbft >>>> >>>> Text to vote on: >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> *[New LTS JDK Adoption]* >>>> • When a new JDK goes LTS, we prioritize: >>>> • Moving trunk to build, run, pass CI, and support language level of >>>> that JDK, dropping others >>>> • Adding support to *run* on that JDK to all supported GA releases, >>>> passing all CI using that JDK >>>> • These 2 operations must merge atomically. This allows us to preserve >>>> the contract of allowing like-to-like JDK's for a live C* upgrade >>>> *[Build, run, language level, Pre Commit CI, EOL]* >>>> • trunk builds, runs, has CI on, and supports the language level of 1 JDK >>>> at any given time (ideally latest LTS JDK) >>>> • Supported non-trunk GA branches: >>>> • build, run, pass CI, and support the language level of *the oldest >>>> JDK they are certified for* >>>> • Are supported to *run* on all LTS JDK's between their oldest >>>> supported and newest LTS supported by trunk >>>> • In the very rare case a feature would have to be removed due to JDK >>>> change (think UDF's scripting engine), we instead keep the maximum >>>> allowable JDK for that feature supported on trunk and subsequent releases. >>>> The feature is flagged for deprecate-then-remove or re-implementation >>>> based on dev ML discussion. If removed, we drop the required older JDK >>>> across all branches when the feature is removed. Supporting new LTS JDK's >>>> is considered higher priority than supporting features that JDK's are no >>>> longer compatible with, pending debate on the dev ML. >>>> • Dropping JDK support happens naturally as old releases go EOL. >>>> *[Post Commit JDK validation CI]* >>>> • Periodically we will run all CI pipelines for all *runtime* supported >>>> JDK's for that branch (cadence TBD) >>>> • We will add basic perf testing across all GA branches + their supported >>>> runtime JDK's with reference workloads from easy-cass-stress for a simple >>>> performance-based smoke test >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Vote structure: >>>> • Roll call >>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+Project+Governance> >>>> is 25. >>>> • Quorum: 13 (min required votes to qualify results) >>>> • Super-majority of participating votes in favor required to pass (9 in >>>> favor at 13 min votes, etc) >>>> Will leave the vote open for a week. >>>>
