We should reach a consensus on the CEP, and then we can adjust the status of Jira to open. If everyone feels that there is no need to start this CEP, then Jira either does not need to be created or there is no need to set it to open.
I think the order to set the jira‘s status is more important than create. Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org>于2025年7月17日 周四下午10:42写道： > I *may* have led Joel astray re: ordering on CEP-50 and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-20768. > > I always thought we created JIRAs proactively to go along w/a CEP and just > closed out the JIRA if we couldn't get to an agreement on things. Mostly > just because of my anal retentive reflex to expect there to be a linked > JIRA in the CEP wiki article (which of course adds no value until the CEP > discussion and vote have passed...). Though in cases where there's > prototype code or artifacts to go along w/a CEP, I think having a JIRA for > that makes sense. > > Anyway - anyone have any opinions here? I don't think it's important > enough to codify anything, just wondering if I should recalibrate my own > assumptions around that structure so I don't potentially lead future people > astray. >
