jesus ...

... even it will be explicitly forbidden to merge the code which has
not gone through non-AI review ...

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 12:17 AM Štefan Miklošovič
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> .... even it will be explicitly forbidden to merge the code WITHOUT A
> REVIEW which was done by AI ....
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 12:01 AM Štefan Miklošovič
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > In the other thread it seems to me we went over positives only when it
> > comes to usage of AI during reviews. There are also negatives of
> > embracing AI / reviews / prompts. I think we should also look at the
> > other side - how it might affect us negatively. I will put on a
> > "negativist" cap for a while to see also the ugly side of this.
> >
> > "PR slop" - by enabling this officially, I expect we will see
> > substantial rise in the volume of PRs of very low quality and
> > reviewers would spend time on PRs which are just nonsensical or highly
> > under-developed. An original author might think that any review issues
> > will be addressed by his / her AI again when some issues arise.
> >
> > This also means that we might grow a generation of authors who do not
> > code anymore the classical style and do not actually know too much
> > about how the code works in a broader context which I think might be
> > detrimental in the long run.
> >
> > Risk of a "lazy reviewer" - committer / reviewer, as busy as they are,
> > even it will be explicitly forbidden to merge the code which was done
> > by AI, will just review it by AI and being under a lot of stress, they
> > might merge it anyway. I think this puts more responsibility on
> > committers to be honest. Not saying we are not doing our best already,
> > but my gut feeling is that once it will be officially in the repo then
> > somebody might take some kind of a "mental shortcut" and not review
> > the classical way.
> >
> > I do not trust AI, inherently. It might guide you at best. Sometimes
> > even that is not true. I believe that by introducing these prompts /
> > context files we will make it nonsensical less often.
> >
> > Anyway I think that by introducing this the bar for quality reviews
> > will be even higher because on the other side there will be AI
> > sitting, not a human anymore.

Reply via email to