> Is there a reason not to use a folder in the current repo that becomes its 
> own jar?  It can even be published separately if we like?

> Mostly to decouple from Cassandra release.
I *think* we could just have that .jar release on its own cadence independently 
of the parent C* project.

Some of us have talked about taking this same approach to making some code from 
C* available to the ecosystem (think I/O .jar that has SSTable read/write, 
CommitLog read/write, etc). This feels like a very similarly shaped thing.

I assume w/a modern build / publish / etc system we'd be able to publish a 
release that represents a strict subset of the parent project out of the repo 
right?

On Mon, Jun 1, 2026, at 8:18 PM, David Capwell wrote:
> Mostly to decouple from Cassandra release.  If there is a feature added does 
> it have to wait for the next major release of Cassandra so others can 
> consume?  Even if we can get to yearly releases that’s still a long wait.
> 
> For example Alex and I have been talking about proper fuzz testing, so best 
> case is a year before 3rd parties could use.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jun 1, 2026, at 4:32 PM, Jeremiah Jordan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Does it need to be a separate repo? Is there a reason not to use a folder in 
>> the current repo that becomes its own jar?  It can even be published 
>> separately if we like?
>> 
>> -Jeremiah
>> 
>> On Jun 1, 2026 at 10:00:15 AM, David Capwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We've discussed pulling utilities out of trunk before. I'd like to actually 
>>> start.  My primary need is for test utilities so my focus is there.
>>> 
>>> This isn't just my need. Sidecar wants property/stateful tests but can't 
>>> use ours without a published jar.
>>> 
>>> Proposed approach:
>>> 
>>> 1. Define scope — start with property/stateful test utilities
>>> 2. Set up the repo and release independently of Cassandra
>>> 3. ...
>>> 4. Cassandra depends on the library
>>> 
>>> I'd focus on the fork first, before making Cassandra depend on it — keeps 
>>> our builds simple and gives the lib room to stabilize. We can sort out the 
>>> dependency question later (wait on releases, or use submodules?).
>>> 
>>> Happy to drive this if there's interest.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone

Reply via email to