On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 1:02 PM Shailaja Koppu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Thanks for taking care of this. This merge definitely improves development 
> velocity. Here are my recommendations for outstanding questions.
>
> 1, I prefer to merge both into a new repo something like 
> cassandra-analytics-and-sidecar, to ensure people don’t think that one of 
> them vanished or no longer exists/supported

I think this is just a matter of communication. As said, the
repository of deprecated Sidecar is not going anywhere. We put a big
fat notice that this repo is no longer maintained and all moved to
analytics. People will not think it has vanished because it will be
still present.

For me the only reason we go with the third repository is to rename
whole cassandra-analytics to something completely different where we
expect software beyond analytics and sidecar to be added in the future
as well. If we start to add things into cassandra-analytics which will
not have necessarily a lot in common while we still wanted to release
it as one thing, maybe creating something like cassandra-ecosystem or
cassandra-platform or similar justifies a third repository to be
created.

> 2, I prefer the same for Jira as well, something like 
> CASS-ANALYTICS-AND_SIDECAR or better name if you can come up with one. And 
> with in that Jira board, separate sub-tags for Analytics and Sidecar, that 
> way if someone needs only Sidecar tasks, they can apply that sub-tag. And 
> admins/developers will be able to filter Jiras based on sub-tags.
> 3, Perhaps we can ask authors to migrate their open PRs to the new repo
> 5, Existing repos can be marked as archived and update Readme pages to 
> redirect incoming developers to the new repo
>
> Thanks,
> Shailaja
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 2026, at 9:30 AM, Štefan Miklošovič <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > More clarification behind that:
> >
> > If we go to merge, it makes more sense to me to merge Sidecar into
> > Analytics than the other way around. Yes, Sidecar also exposes
> > functionality which has nothing to do with Analytics as such but it is
> > still better than merging Analytics into Sidecar, imho. We basically
> > can't use Analytics without Sidecar. Sidecar is inherently part of
> > Analytics.
> >
> > If we were to create a third repository where both are merged, we
> > would need to likely come up with a new name for that project, create
> > a new JIRA subproject ... We would then deprecate both repositories
> > instead of just one and create basically a brand new project. I
> > consider this to be just unnecessary. We would just make everything
> > more complex.
> >
> > From ASF perspective I do not think that we would need to move a
> > repository to deprecate to "Attic". My understanding is that Attic is
> > something where whole projects are moved. We do not have a separate
> > PMC for Sidecar / Analytics so I think that we can just merge these as
> > we want.
> >
> > (1) https://attic.apache.org/
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 10:04 AM Štefan Miklošovič
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> My (personal) take on this:
> >>
> >> 1) Merging into one repository, no into a new repository.
> >> 2) Retiring CASSSIDECAR and using only CASSANALYTICS. Existing tickets
> >> under CASSSIDECAR can be delivered into a new repository.
> >> 3) Nothing. There are 24 PRs in Sidecar repo, 14 are some "chore".
> >> Converting the rest, even manually, to analytics repo is easy.
> >> 4) maybe we can start to use pre-ci and ci? Why are we so fixated on 
> >> Circle?
> >> 5) only cassandra-sidecar will be deprecated, will be marked as read
> >> only / archived, we will not remove it
> >> 6) yes
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 10:20 PM Josh McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to propose we merge the cassandra-sidecar and 
> >>> cassandra-analytics repositories. I've shopped the idea around to some of 
> >>> you and gotten universally positive feedback with some questions about 
> >>> details we deferred to this discussion.
> >>>
> >>> Reasons we should merge:
> >>>
> >>> Break circular dependencies between the 2 projects
> >>> Remove redundant copy/pasted code
> >>> Simplify build and CI
> >>> Reduce friction on changes that span both projects
> >>> Simplify the CDC implementation
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Outstanding questions and observations that came up:
> >>>
> >>> Do we merge one repository into the other? Or do we create a new project 
> >>> and bring them both in?
> >>> What do we do about JIRA? Leave separate or combine?
> >>> What do we do with open issues and PR's in github?
> >>> We'll need to thoughtfully update CI (github + circle) since we're right 
> >>> at the limit on the free tier on both projects
> >>> What do we do about existing deprecated repositories (cassandra-analytics 
> >>> and/or cassandra-sidecar)?
> >>> We'll need to update our release process
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Other observations or questions welcome, as are thoughts on the entire 
> >>> process, on the outstanding questions, etc.
> >>>
> >>> Looking forward to the discussion everyone.
> >>>
> >>> ~Josh
>

Reply via email to