We use
WAS 4.0 and Castor which uses a 1.2 JDK. We can't upgrade the app server for a
variety of reasons in any short period of time. I vote for some form
of conditional compilation.
-Matt
Tim,
if
that's the case (and unless there's other objecting), I'll try to get 0.9.9
migrated to JDK 1.3. But let's hear whether there's anybody out there feeling
in a different way.
Thanks
Werner
Hi
Werner,
unless there's an
overwhelming outcry to retain the JDK 1.2 code base, I would urge you to
move to JDK 1.3.
We can get by
with an older version of Castor JDO, whether that be 0.9.7 or 0.9.9.
As to using Eclipse for building apps,
I have written a number of Ant scripts that can be run from WSAD 5.1 or
using a stand-alone mode which calls out to the WSAD runtime environment and
uses the WSAD workspace for CVS extraction and Java compilation. You may be
able to tailor that for Eclipse.
WSAD provides a range of WAS specific plugins, which is ideal for our
situation, but you may need equivalent plugins for other app servers (eg.
WebLogic).
TIm.
+++
Tim Telcik
Technical
Application Architect
Business Systems Delivery
Information Technology
Services, HBF, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 9214 6744
Fax: 9214 6779
| "Werner Guttmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/05/2005 04:22 PM
|
Please respond
to
dev@castor.codehaus.org |
|
|
To
| <dev@castor.codehaus.org>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [castor-dev] Castor and JDK
1.2 |
|
Andrew,
with Ant, this should be easy, using 'if'
attributes on our targets. As to Eclipse, don't ask me how ... ;-). But I am
sure there's ways ...
Werner
-----Original
Message-----
From: Andrew Fawcett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:11
AM
To: dev@castor.codehaus.org
Subject: RE: [castor-dev] Castor and
JDK 1.2
Hi Werner,
I've been wondering about this for my
Java 5 enhancements to Castor XML.
We would need to reflect this some
how in both the Ant and Eclipse project files I
guess.
Andy.
From: Werner Guttmann
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 May 2005 09:08
To:
dev@castor.codehaus.org
Subject: RE: [castor-dev] Castor and JDK
1.2
Hi Tim,
I wonder whether we should consider moving
towards conditional compilation with Castor. That would imply, though, that
not all features would be available for a particular
JDK.
Werner
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:56 AM
To:
dev@castor.codehaus.org
Subject: RE: [castor-dev] Castor and JDK
1.2
Hi Werner,
yeah, we're trying to move away from
JDK 1.2 (WAS 4.0) as quickly as possible.
I will plug Castor JD0
0.9.7 and 0.9.9 into our apps as soon as possible.
Tim
+++
Tim Telcik
Technical Application Architect
Business
Systems Delivery
Information Technology Services, HBF, Inc.
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 9214 6744 Fax: 9214
6779
"Werner Guttmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/05/2005 03:39 PM Please respond
to
dev@castor.codehaus.org
To<dev@castor.codehaus.org>
cc
SubjectRE: [castor-dev] Castor and JDK
1.2
Hi Tim,
ideally, less than two
months, if possible. And I guess you would want to use upcoming releases
like 0.9.7 or 0.9.9 on JDK 1.2, correct
?
Regards
Werner
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12,
2005 4:38 AM
To: dev@castor.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [castor-dev]
Castor and JDK 1.2
Hi Werner & Co.
we are still
using JDK 1.2 as part of WebSphere Application Server 4.0.
There is
work underway here to migrate to WebSphere Application Server 5.1 which uses
JDK 1.3. IBM no longer supports WAS 4.0, hence the move.
I suspect
we will be using WAS 4 (and JDK 1.2) for the next 3 months (6 months at the
worst) during the transition.
What time frame are you thinking of
for migrating from JDK 1.2 to 1.3 ?
Thanks.
Tim.
+++
Tim Telcik
Technical Application Architect
Business
Systems Delivery
Information Technology Services, HBF, Inc.
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 9214 6744 Fax: 9214
6779
"Werner Guttmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/05/2005 03:00 AM Please respond
to
dev@castor.codehaus.org
To"dev@castor.codehaus.org"
<dev@castor.codehaus.org>, "user@castor.codehaus.org"
<user@castor.codehaus.org>
cc
Subject[castor-dev] Castor and
JDK 1.2
Hi,
as we are trying to make
some decisions with regards to future features, we'd be interested to learn
if there's still users out
there that require Castor (JDO) to work with
JDK 1.2. If that's the case, can you please come forward and indicate to us
why
this would still be required ? If I don't hear from anybody within a
couple of days, we'll assume that we can move to JDK 1.3 as
the least
common
denominator.
Thanks
Werner
============================================================
HBF
Health Funds Inc. a registered organisation under the National Health
Act
HBF Insurance Pty Ltd ACN 009 268 277
This email is a
confidential communication intended only for the named Addressee(s). If you
are not that person any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
email or the information in it is prohibited. Please notify us immediately
by telephone, (+61) 08 9265 6111 or return email and delete this
email.
============================================================
HBF
Health Funds Inc. a registered organisation under the National Health
Act
HBF Insurance Pty Ltd ACN 009 268 277
This email is a
confidential communication intended only for the named Addressee(s). If you
are not that person any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
email or the information in it is prohibited. Please notify us immediately
by telephone, (+61) 08 9265 6111 or return email and delete this
email.
The information in this message is
confidential and may be legally privileged. It may not be disclosed to, or
used by, anyone other than the addressee. If you receive this message in
error, please advise us immediately.
Internet emails are not
necessarily secure. CODA does not accept responsibility for changes to any
email which occur after the email has been sent. Attachments to this email
may contain software viruses, which could damage your systems. CODA has
checked the attachments for viruses before sending, but you should
virus-check them before opening.
============================================================
HBF Health Funds Inc. a registered organisation under the National Health Act
HBF Insurance Pty Ltd ACN 009 268 277
This email is a confidential communication intended only for the named Addressee(s). If you are not that person any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this email or the information in it is prohibited. Please notify us immediately by telephone, (+61) 08 9265 6111 or return email and delete this email. |
**************************************************************************************************
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
They are intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager or the
sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies.
**************************************************************************************************
