Hi, I completely agree with Greg's assessment, as release 0.0.9 is meant to be a feature release (as opposed to a maintenance release lile 0.9.6 and 0.9.7). In my humble opinion, back-porting will not be an option to you in this case.
Werner -----Original Message----- From: Gregory Block [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 13. September 2005 11:39 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Using access="read-only" in the mapping file Between 0.9.7 and 0.9.9, there are a great number of code changes around the handling of dependent objects, including changes to bring in polymorphism support and a major refactoring of quite a bit of code - as well as a bugfix somewhere in there on dependent object handling, amongst others. Trying to backport that change to 0.9.5, without bringing the rest with it, strikes me as... mildly insane. :) On 13 Sep 2005, at 10:16, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am going to try and go through the change logs between these two > releases and see what fix went in to make the problem go away (I need > the change so that I can back port it onto the 0.9.5 release). > In the mean time, if the problem rings a bell could you point me to > the fix? ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
