On 10/14/05, Ralf Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some month ago Werner, Bruce, Gregory and myself had a discussion on IRC
> about futur direction of CastorJDO. We all agreed that we first need to
> resolve some of the known bugs and limitations as well as add some
> frequently requested features like polymorphism. As we have added the
> most important features we are now working toward 1.0 release. But still
> there are quite some more issues to resolve where you could help us with
> ;-) .
>
> As our long term target for CastorJDO Bruce voted to work on getting
> compliant to JDO standard, while Werner, Gregory and myself were in
> favour of EJB 3.0 compliance. Still nothing is decided yet and need to
> be discussed once again.
Because I am a member of the JSR-243 (JDO 2) and I have good friends
who are members of JSR-220 (EJB 3.0), I have changed my perspective on
the idea of chasing JDO 2.0 compliance. Actually I think it would be
more beneficial for the project to work toward EJB 3 compliance.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
