Sachith, I'll review the code you uploaded later on today and provide you with feedback as soon as possible.
Werner Sachith Dhanushka wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded a basic implementation as I promissed earlier in to > CASTOR-2016. Werner, please be kind enough to review the code and > provide me with some feedback. In the mean time I will keep on > improving the code. > > > I have a small question on schema handling. > > There is a JAXB2 annotated class which has set of non-requried > properties (REQUIRED=false). All the properties that this class has > are non-required. Should these properties included under Choice or > under sequence with minOcurrs=0? This is bit of a tricky question for > me as the annotations are not helping me here. I appreciate if some > one can help me to resolve this problem. > > > Thanks, SD > > > On 6/21/07, *Sachith Dhanushka* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hi Werner, > > Thanks for the answer. So I won't use any JAXB2 RI code. > > I am now working with JAXB2 reflection library found in > https://jaxb2-reflection.dev.java.net/ > <https://jaxb2-reflection.dev.java.net/> and creating Castor model. > Will post my initial bit of code soon. > > Thanks, SD > > > On 6/20/07, *Werner Guttmann* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Sachith, > > your task is to come up with a solution that adds certain > functionality to Castor to make it (or parts thereof) JAXB compliant. > In the context of this statement, JAXB compliance refers to the > specification. > > Clearly, it cannot be as simple as taking parts of the JAXB reference > implementation and integrate it with Castor. There's plenty of > issues with this approach, which I should not have to explain to you, > one of them being licensing. > > Yes, nobody wants to re-invent the wheel, but simply pulling parts of > the JAXB RI into Castor is not an option. > > Regards Werner > > Sachith Dhanushka wrote: >> Hi Werner and all, >> >> This is what I am trying to do now. As I commented in the JIRA > also, now >> I am using the java.net <http://java.net> <http://java.net> > jaxb2 reflection library >> instead of annongen Jam. So I am working on that now. >> >> In addition to that please let me know the feasibility of the > following >> approach as well. When I looked in to JAXB2 schema generation, > I can use >> the existing JAXB2 RI to get a DOM model of the schema. In > other words, >> we can give set of JAXB annotated classes and get the schema as > a DOM >> model. Then we can create our Castor schema model by looking at > the DOM >> model. The problem with this approach is that we get an > intermediate DOM >> object model. But the advantage is this approach is that this > is less >> error-prone and standard as we can use the implementation from > the JAXB >> RI itself. >> >> Please let me know what you think about this approach. >> >> Thanks, SD > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
