Hi Michael, as always, start with the absolute minimum required (i.e. the four new methods discussed and everything required to support those), and in the future build on this.
If you find something that's easy to be achieved (refactored) in this case, do not hesitate to go about this now. Cheers Werner Michael Schröder wrote: > So Werner, > > > > we recently thought about the BaseResolver class you told us to implement in > order to refactor the ResolverStrategy. The attachment contains our proposal > for a possible new class structure. We weren’t sure whether you want us to > refactor everything or only create this new class in order to define the new > isCascading… methods on a good and central spot. > > > > The question now is, whether our task also is to refactor all the > implementations of possible ResolverStrategies and try to pull out methods > which can also be implemented in this new abstract class or only to use the > new class for the four new Methods caring about the cascading functionality? > > > > Lg Ivo > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
