Well, it has GUI and command-line (which can be automated) support. I'm kind of in the mood to play with it today, so I'll try to put together something. I've been running it (GUI-mode) against some of the Java stuff around here and it is finding "interesting" things. :-)
Thanks, /dev/mrg On 2/1/07, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"FindBugs" names seems to imply too much for an automated tool :-) Can you post a report somewhere showing what kind of "bugs" it finds? Andrus On Feb 1, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > What would the general consensus be here of using FindBugs > (http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/)? I just used the 1.1.1 version to > analyze Cayenne 3.0 and it is reporting 1720 (potential) bugs (at > least on my current source tree). I haven't used this tool much yet, > but it seems like it could be useful. I also believe it has support > to run in the background, like from an ant task. This could be useful > for nightly builds. Or even like a weekly report of some kind. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks! > > /dev/mrg >
