Sure, lets wait for another day or two to establish lazy consensus.
Andrus
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
Should we wait for others to chime in before making the change?
--
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
Even better :-)
I just added your id to Cayenne project admins in Jira. Let
me know if this wasn't enough to edit the versions.
Andrus
On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
I think once you "archive" a version it's no longer
selectable in any
of the issue filings. For instance, we'd probably archive
1.2, 1.2.1,
2.0, and 2.0.1, so they could not be selected as "affects" or "fix
version".
Bugs would then be logged against 1.2.2 and 2.0.2, with 1.2.3 and
2.0.3
available as fix versions. Versions that are archived still retain
their changelogs though. So, I think that would address
your concern.
I'm not sure how far back that feature goes, though, and if it's
available in the version the ASF runs. A JIRA admin would have to
look into that.
--
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
+1
The downside is that we'll have a very long list of versions, with
higher probability of making a mistake when picking one.
But the upside (at least I hope) will be that the
RELEASE-NOTES can
be generated straight from Jira, regardless how many versions a
particular fix affected (currently the RELEASE-NOTES.txt is built
manually).
Andrus
