+1, I like this format, but see comments below.
* A member of the Apache Geronimo has started some work on
integration between the two projects.
There were multiple people involved from both communities, some are
Geronimo committers, some - Cayenne, some - neither. So I'd say we
rephrase it - "First attempts were made by Cayenne and Geronimo
communities to integrate Cayenne JPA provider in Geronimo".
We have only some minor issues with Confluence still to resolve,
but otherwise everything is working well.
Which one is that?
Andrus
On Mar 12, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 12/03/2007, at 9:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Not sure what we can report this month that is of the significance
to the Board, although lots of development work has been done.
Looking through some other reports [1] something like this might be
appropriate:
-----------------
Issues requiring the Board's attention: none.
Infrastructure
--------------
We'd like to thank the ASF Infrastructure team for the painless
transition to TLP. We have only some minor issues with Confluence
still to resolve, but otherwise everything is working well.
Development
-----------
* Cayenne continues to make good progress towards its goal of JPA
compliance with the 3.0 release.
* A member of the Apache Geronimo has started some work on
integration between the two projects.
* Snapshots from the 3.0 branch are now being made available as
precompiled binaries to enhance wider testing of the new features.
Community
---------
No real changes here, although the mailing lists have been busier
than usual.
-----------------
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2006/
board_minutes_2006_12_20.txt
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
phone +61 2 9660 9700
PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
