Race condition in DataContext.localObject()
-------------------------------------------

                 Key: CAY-786
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-786
             Project: Cayenne
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Cayenne Core Library
    Affects Versions: 1.2 [STABLE], 2.0 [STABLE], 3.0
            Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
         Assigned To: Andrus Adamchik
            Priority: Critical
             Fix For: 1.2 [STABLE], 2.0 [STABLE], 3.0


I've been trying to track down for some time a uniquing breakage in my 
production application. The app would randomly throw FaultFailureExceptions for 
objects resolved via to-one relationships:

org.apache.cayenne.FaultFailureException: [v.3.0-SNAPSHOT Mar 12 2007 15:24:28] 
Error resolving fault for ObjectId: <ObjectId:EEE, ID=18> and state (hollow). 
Possible cause - matching row is missing from the database.
        at org.apache.cayenne.BaseContext.prepareForAccess(BaseContext.java:106)
        
The exception text is misleading. In fact what happened is that the HOLLOW 
object being resolved was previously kicked out from the ObjectStore and 
replaced with another object for the same id. The race condition is in 
DataContext.localObject():         

            Persistent localObject = (Persistent) descriptor.createObject();

            localObject.setObjectContext(this);
            localObject.setObjectId(id);

            getGraphManager().registerNode(id, localObject);

This entire block of code has to be synchronized. This exception is not very 
common, as DataContext is normally not reused by many parallel threads... 
However I've been successfully using a shared DataContext in a read-only 
high-volume app and it worked very nicely... except for this case. I also 
suspect that this same race condition may have other visible consequences... I 
was just able to trfack the most obvious one that results in FFE.



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to