its been a while since i read through the inbox for this list, and at the risk of getting slightly OT..
i presume most here are firefox empowered? http://noscript.net/ does double duty in that it keeps a lot of ad scripts being fetched, as well as keeping my browsing habits mine :) cheers, j ( oh and another ambivilent +0 on adding it to the cayenne site... i'd read the reports, but wouldnt be contributing any data of my own ;) ) On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:11 +0300, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > I am generally impressed with Google tools, but I am also in the > privacy freak camp. Still I know that the battle for online (or real > world) privacy is lost and this or that small concession is benign by > itself and doesn't change much in the big picture. So my vote is +0, > meaning I won't actively object it and won't pretend that I don't > care to read the generated reports :-). > > Andrus > > > On May 30, 2007, at 3:04 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > > > The recent conversation on Infra about Google Analytics for Apache > > projects is interesting. I should have thought of it earlier since > > I've been using their services for a whole bunch of our customers. > > It produces really useful reports. > > > > Would anyone object if I added this service to the Cayenne site? It > > involves one piece of javascript which causes an extra fetch from a > > Google server on every page load. I've not noticed any speed > > degradation in even our busiest sites and the personal info shared > > with Google is just the typical ones: which page, what IP, is Flash/ > > Java/etc installed. Nothing to identify individual people beyond > > their IP address which is in the Apache logs anyway. > >... > > > > Cheers > > Ari > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
