I don't mind resurrecting QueryUtils, but is a count method the only thing that would go in it?
Thanks, /dev/mrg On 6/5/07, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[taking to dev] There was an old QueryUtils class that was used for some internal obscure queries. It's long gone (don't even remember which version dumped it). So now we can reuse the name for the user-friendly utility class (if we decide to go this way). Andrus On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > Hasn't QueryUtils gone poof in 3.0? > > /dev/mrg > > > On 6/5/07, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> So where do we put it then? QueryUtils? >> >> Andrus >> >>
