BTW, I just checked in the code that supports Map relationships (and
Set relationships, although this is not that exciting) per CAY-848:
https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-848
Mapping that via the Modeler and runtime execution works. There are
still a few loose ends, most notably updating the relationship map
after commit to remap the objects whose map key property has changed.
Andrus
On Jun 23, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
Does the "JPA-inspiried classic features" include expanded mapping
of relationships? In particular, does it currently include the
notion of mapping a to-many relationship as a map, instead of a
list? :)
Robert
On Jun 22, 2007, at 6/224:01 PM , Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Jun 22, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
I'm not really opposed, but I haven't looked much at the JPA stuff.
This release is definitely alpha. While one can do real
persistence with Cayenne JPA already, we do not claim any kind of
completeness. Still good to have new JPA-inspired classic features
out there (such as lifecycle callbacks), as we'll get user
feedback and better chance of finding the bugs early.
However, do we still have an unresolved issue with the password
encoding? I
tried to subscribe to the Apache Legal mailing list several times
and never
got added, so I could never take the question over there.
Hmm... not sure whom we ping to get this resolved... One thing to
check - have you used your apache.org email? This may speed up
subscription moderation.
PS. I'd advertise the new JPA/etc stuff as alpha-quality, but
emphasis the
Cayenne Classic stuff is stable.
Yep, that's the plan.
Andrus
