MacOS X 10.4 (intel) Java 5
Maven 2.0.7

Same here. I was still on mvn 2.0.6, but I upgraded. I can get past compiling cayenne-jdk1.4-unpublished, although now my build fails in itests in jpa-chapter5, something related to the forced upgrade of OpenEJB/Geronimo. So I have that new error to figure out:

21:30:54,858 FATAL [startup] OpenEJB has encountered a fatal error and cannot be started: The Assembler encountered an unexpected error while attempting to build the container system. java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.GenericConnectionManager.<init> (Lorg/apache/geronimo/connector/outbound/connectionmanagerconfig/ TransactionSupport;Lorg/apache/geronimo/connector/outbound/ connectionmanagerconfig/PoolingSupport;ZLorg/apache/geronimo/ connector/outbound/connectiontracking/ConnectionTracker;Ljavax/ transaction/TransactionManager;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/ ClassLoader;)V at org.apache.openejb.resource.GeronimoConnectionManagerFactory.create (GeronimoConnectionManagerFactory.java:158)


/Users/kmenard/dev/cayenne/framework/cayenne-jdk1.4-unpublished/src/ main/jav
a/org/apache/cayenne/ejbql/parser/Node.java:[29,7] duplicate class:
org.apache.cayenne.ejbql.parser.Node

Could you check where this is coming from? It seems to be the root cause messing up everything else...

Andrus




On Oct 20, 2007, at 9:12 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:

MacOS X 10.4 (intel) Java 5
Maven 2.0.7

This is the exact configuration I was using with everything working fine a week ago. So, the only two things that I think could have happened are a change in the code or a change in one of the maven plugins. Unfortunately,
I don't know exactly what versions of those I was running last week.

Perhaps you could try running "mvn -U clean compile"? If it breaks, we'll have some fun figuring it out, but at least we can either point at a maven
plugin or a code change.

--
Kevin


On 10/20/07 1:40 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Strange. What Java and Maven version are you using?

Andrus

On Oct 20, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:




Reply via email to