Yeah. I was looking a bit, and I think we'd need a new assembly profile. It turned out to be a lot quicker to untar and zip it up manually. Not ideal, but I felt zip really should be used for the Windows release.
If not, I can put the gzipped tarballs up, but I'm not sure it gains us much. -- Kevin On 10/29/07 2:05 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice!! > > A question - I can't find what in the Maven build triggers .zip > creation for Windows? We built 3.0M1 as .tar.gz for Win, so I was > surprised to see zips. > > Andrus > > > On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:56 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was >> tagged a >> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has >> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results >> were all >> positive. >> >> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/ >> >> Note that I've built the Windows one, but did have a single test >> failure. >> Given that it was not observed on other platforms, it was likely an >> environmental thing. I will try to look into it some more. >> >> Also, this is my first attempt at signing assemblies, so please >> verify the >> signatures. >> >> Thanks, >> Kevin >> >> > --
