If people feel strongly enough about it, another option would be to pull
CM out altogether and host it as a non-ASF project.  I'm personally not
a fan of it, but if doing so would significantly improve the quality of
the modeler, I'd warm up to it.  I've just not been adequately convinced
that that'll be the case.

-- 
Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Gentry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: AppFramework licensing discussion

I suppose in a round-about way this answers another thing I had
thought about before.  I was wondering if re-doing the modeler in
NetBeans (using Matisse -- or whatever they are calling it these days)
would be good, but NB uses Swing Layout Extensions which it'll bundle
in your jar for you, but the license would be bad for ASF:

https://swing-layout.dev.java.net/

It uses LGPL.

/dev/mrg

Reply via email to