I can play around with the first suggestion later this week. I'm not
adamant either way. I just want what is best for the end-user, even
if the underlying Cayenne code is a bit more complex.
Changing the method name to getDatabaseValue() is fine.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. What I was suggesting was being able to do:
>
> public interface MyInterface extends ExtendedEnumeration<String>
> {
> public String databaseValue();
> }
>
> And the Cayenne bit could just accept Object anyway.
>
> As another suggested improvement, it'd probably be useful to rename
> databaseValue to adhere to the JavaBeans naming convention. It would
> make introspection a bit easier.
>
> --
>
> Kevin Menard
> Servprise International, Inc.
> Remote reboot & power control for your network
> www.servprise.com +1 508.892.3823 x308
