That's exactly what I meant by a more orderly world ... :-) Everything I work on seems to be maintenance/enhancement of legacy systems.
I don't mind swapping the order they appear in the docs, but I still think the extended ones are more reliable and flexible. I tried to point out the shortcomings of the standard approach -- I just don't want anyone getting burned by the integer issue with them. /dev/mrg On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am lucky to have fewer (if any) legacy systems to deal with in the > last 3 years. > > Andrus > > > > > On Mar 14, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > > That just tells me you live in a more orderly world than I do. :-) > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Andrus Adamchik > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I still think it is logical to start with "Standard" and then move to > >> "Extended", but otherwise looks great. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Andrus > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mar 14, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > >> > >>> I moved the enumeration documentation to here: > >>> > >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAYDOC/Modeling+Object > >>> +Layer > >>> > >>> And deleted it off the Extended Types page. Let me know if that's > >>> what you were thinking. > >>> > >>> I also checked in the other changes to the code, so I think this can > >>> close out CAY-994 unless you think of anything else that should be > >>> done for it right away. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
