On Mar 28, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
Question... Once we do that, would that mean that we only solved 50%
of the broken cases? Mapping cases showing remaining problems are
welcomed.
I know that the patch I provided did fix a subset of cases for me.
It did
allow the test case for CAY-1009 to pass. It also allowed tests in
my own
app that's been blocked on the issue to pass. The test case for
CAY-1008
still fails though, so it clearly wouldn't address the problem
globally.
It changed 'getReverseRelationship' which is a generic method not
specifically related to runtime relationships logic (and I must admit
I still don't fully understand the logic in the fix..) Anyways, what
I'm saying is that the caller of this method should be responsible for
making a decision whether a runtime relationship makes sense or not,
not the method itself.
Andrus
