In this case method redundancy in the interface is benign enough (from
the POV of proxying and nesting of contexts), so maybe that's ok.
Andrus
On Jun 4, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
I advocate this being applied to ObjectContext rather than
DataContext. deleteObjects doesn't exist in ObjectContext, which is
really quite annoying for the client. I'd hate to see further
disparity.
--
Kevin
On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906
#action_12906 ]
Andrus Adamchik commented on CAY-1065:
--------------------------------------
A few notes:
1. void registerNewObjects(List objects) -> void
registerNewObjects(Collection objects)
2. void registerNewObjects(Object[] objects) - no specific
objections, but if we do that, than to preserve some symmetry, we
need to provide a similar method for deleteObjects,
unregsiterObjects, etc. Maybe that's ok... Currently I have no
opinion... Also check out Java 5 vararg notation: void
registerNewObjects(Object... objects)
Add registerNewObjects() method to DataContext
----------------------------------------------
Key: CAY-1065
URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-1065
Project: Cayenne
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Cayenne Core Library
Affects Versions: 3.0
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Michael Gentry
Assignee: Michael Gentry
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.0
Add registerNewObjects() method to DataContext which is a cover
method which calls registerNewObject(). Make at least two methods:
void registerNewObjects(List objects)
void registerNewObjects(Object[] objects)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
