Thinking it over, the proposed path looks fine. I was a little under the
weather the last time I looked and wanted to make a note so I didn't
forget about it later. I see Andrey has already submitted a patch, so
I'll poke around with it.
--
Kevin
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:28:59 -0400, Andrus Adamchik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Suggested procedure seems very straightforward regardless of whether the
relationship is one step or multi-step. What are you concerns about
many-to-many?
Andrus
On Jul 2, 2008, at 3:32 AM, Kevin Menard (JIRA) wrote:
Kevin Menard commented on CAY-1077:
-----------------------------------
It would also be nice if we could make many-to-many relationships
easier to handle. I think the proposed path will improve things quite
a bit, but it may still be a little awkward dealing with the join
tables. I'll have to think about that one a bit more.
