Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > Still I see no point to split the adapters that *we* provide from > Cayenne runtime. > Well, I thought that with such a split, Cayenne could support directly and "officially", less DBs (but overall to support more DBs) so that the testing work (when releasing) to be much faster. If I saw correctly, the most of the work(taking a few days) before every relase, was to test Cayenne on all databases.
I believed that having "outsourced" the DB part (except a 2 few very used ones - e.g. MySQL, etc.) would reduce the effort of the core team to concentrate on the general things, and make faster release cycles. Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > Also it will break DB auto-detection feature (the auto > adapter). > You are right. If it breaks existing features than it is a very bad idea :(. Sorry. Toni. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cayenne.dba.*-%3A-same-handling-like-drivers--tp18636163p18648079.html Sent from the Cayenne - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
