On 23/10/2008, at 1:46 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
We got a bunch of tasks closed and new tasks started since we had
this discussion last time. So is everybody ok with tagging M5 or are
there reasons to wait longer?
Absolutely. It has been long enough since M4. For that matter, once we
resolve the API changes surrounding generics, what is preventing a
release of 3.0? I think it would be good for the public visibility of
Cayenne to have a final release of 3.0 soon. If it were not for the
API effects of moving to generics m4 could well have been labelled 3.0
and this coming release 3.1.
I believe we are already advocating to people that they use 3.0M4 in
production, so we should formalise that with a properly labelled
release. Should we agree to:
3.0M5: next week
3.0M6: inheritance and prefetch (and other bits which are in progress
now), plus finalisation of generics
3.0 beta 1: no more API changes
I don't have the rights to create milestones in Jira, but some triage
work to organise remaining tasks might be useful.
Regards
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
