Or "Access Revenge" ... like planting a backdoor. I agree with Andrus/Ari. No harm in making the change, just add it to the release notes.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]> wrote: > Not to mention that "reveng" looks like "revenge" in English. > At first I thought someone was making a joke :-) > > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I am feeling like the package for the new naming stuff, "access.reveng", >> should either be renamed or moved to some existing package. Two reasons: >> >> * Classes and interfaces there by themselves do not deal with "reverse >> engineering". They are used during reverse engineering by other classes >> located elsewhere (and can potentially be used for other things, e.g. >> creating an ObjEntity in the Modeler from a DbEntity. >> >> * Don't like using an abbreviation ("reveng"). We've been guilty of that in >> the past (ObjEntity), but now trying to stay away from abbrevs. >> >> Not completely sure where it would fit though. >> "org.apache.cayenne.map.naming" maybe? >> >> Andrus >> >
