We already have this in the DataMap XML and cayenne.xml:
<property name="XXX" value="YYY"/>
So there are some properties that Cayenne recognizes. Some are used
for the core features (and probably should not be "properties"), such
as DataMap 'defaultPackage', some are properties for optional (but
bundled) extensions, such as JGroups module setup, which I think
should stay as properties.
I guess we need a different namespace for the user properties, but no
reason not to reuse the XML pattern. E.g.:
<!-- without a parent element -->
<user-property name="XXX" value="YYY"/>
This way we have some consistency.
Andrus
On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 01/06/2009, at 7:30 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
Also could you please wrap "info" tags in XML to parent tag, e.g.
<infoset>
<info.../>
...
</infoset>
Why? I don't think that makes it any easier to parse or manipulate.
And we don't have ObjEntity wrapped in ObjEntitySet, ObjAttribute in
ObjAttributeSet, etc.
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
