As per: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#schema-loc:

Second URI is "hint as to the location of a schema document defining names
for that namespace name".
I think Eclipse really tries to download XSD from that URI.

2009/6/10 Andrey Razumovsky <[email protected]>

> Hi Ari,
>
> Here is Datamap.xml header generated by CM:
>
> <data-map xmlns="http://cayenne.apache.org/schema/3.0/modelMap";
>   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>   xsi:schemaLocation="http://cayenne.apache.org/schema/3.0/modelMap
> http://cayenne.apache.org/schema/3.0/modelMap";
>   project-version="3.0">
>
> I think it fails because second url in xsi:schemaLocation (
> http://cayenne.apache.org/schema/3.0/modelMap) points to HTML, not to XSD.
>
> 2009/6/10 Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Andrey
>>
>> What is the schema location is it trying to load from?
>>
>> How did you generate the datamap XML? Did you create a new project in
>> Cayenne Modeler? If you like, send me the XML offlist and I can see if I can
>> reproduce the problem.
>>
>>
>> Ari Maniatis
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/6/09 5:18 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ari,
>>>
>>> I've created a JIRA issue. Seems that Eclipse is trying to download XSD
>>> from
>>> specified location, but it is simple HTML.
>>>
>>> 2009/6/5 Aristedes Maniatis<[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  On 5/6/09 7:19 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I started getting problems with validating DataMap XMLs in Eclipse. It
>>>>> says
>>>>> "Referenced file [i.e. our xsd schema] contains errors". And there are
>>>>> a
>>>>> lot
>>>>> of errors in details. Does anyone have such problems?
>>>>>
>>>>>  I haven't seen any problems, but I'm not terribly surprised given that
>>>> there hasn't been any enforced validation until now. If you have some
>>>> details I am sure we can work through them to figure out what needs to
>>>> be
>>>> tweaked. For example, the XSD is sensitive to the order of elements: I
>>>> think
>>>> I got the order right, but maybe something is mixed up.
>>>>
>>>> Ari Maniatis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to