Yes, we probably should, as well as finishing EJB3.0 missing pieces
like support for constructors and OUTER joins (IIRC these are the 2
things not working in Cayenne 3.0 EJBQL)...
Also probably should rename it to CQL (Cayenne Query Language) to
avoid wrong associations and allow us to add our own extensions (e.g.
add support for DB expressions).
Andrus
On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
In Sun's released J2EE6 there are introduced several improvings of
JPQL,
analogue of our EJBQL [1]. Some features, like CASE expressions, look
exciting. Just curious, does anyone have a plan to improve EJBQL to
supoort
that?
[1]
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/JavaEE/JavaEE6Overview_Part3.html
--
Andrey
